| Vendors of engineering
applications continue to suffer from lack of demand for their
products. Our survey covers classic CAD vendors, analysis and
simulation vendors and engineering document management vendors
with publicly available filed accounts.
The graph
on our website plots the average vendor revenues per 3-month
period for the Euro against the US$ since Q1 2000, when the
exchange rates were pretty close to parity - €1= $0.988.
At the end of this period, Q1 2003, the Euro rate has, for
the first time, gone beyond the $1 mark - €1=$1.07282.
This means that the Euro has effectively risen by nearly 10%
against the $US in this period.
With most of the Q1 2003 financial results
announced, the above chart gives two main messages:
1) 2003, regardless of which currency view is taken, is not
looking as though it is the end of the downturn for EMEA.
The peak of Q4 2002 was less pronounced than the previous
2 peaks in 2001 and 2000, and the trend continues downwards.
2) Whilst the picture in $US may be more positive, showing
a small (2%) increase over Q1 2002, when we look in Euros,
the measure of domestic demand, we see a sharp fall over Q1
2002 of some 15%.
This decline in investment in engineering
applications is consistent with the pattern of investment
in the European economies over the last two years. The latest
(February 03) forecasts by PwC
show investment picking up in 2003, but we rather doubt whether
engineering applications will be in the frontline for this
investment. Other areas such as industrial automation appear
to offer better business cases in the short term - and with
today's economy it is the short term that matters.
Nick
Ballard
back to top
|
|
I hate to be the bearer
of bad tidings, but our research tells us that investment in
engineering design applications was down last year, with a further
decline predicted this year. After a year of wars, bombs and
natural disasters, design solution suppliers are looking for
light at the end of the investment tunnel.
An interesting observation is that a number
of companies selling analysis and simulation technologies
are seeing increased sales, as they did last year. Take MSC
Software. Last quarter worldwide revenues were up 28% over
last years' results. Ansys Inc., another major analysis company
saw revenues increase over 15% compared with the previous
year.
So what's the difference between the analysis
and simulation market and the design solutions market? We'd
argue that the answer lies in the inability of vendors to
present their products in a light that delivers positive business
value. The board of directors wants to see profit, not technology.
They want to hear about positive cashflow in short timeframes
with minimum risk. Gone are the days when you could justify
an investment because of its great new features or long term
benefits.
Generating a business case that conforms
to the typical user's internal rules on capital returns etc.
is not easy. It often involves processes to manage the risk
that benefits won't be achieved, several departments may have
to sign up for a particular saving. Simple return on investment
is not sufficient.
Successful implementations of engineering
design and product data management improve sales capability,
reduce time to market, improve production throughput and reduce
service overheads. They reduce overhead costs by reducing
inventory, manufacturing rework and prototype costs. They
improve engineering innovation, efficiency and capability.
They allow companies to integrate suppliers and customers
into the development cycle, improving the quality of product
and service. They reduce risk and encourage greater product
and service differentiation. Benefits are delivered throughout
the lifecycle of a product to numerous stakeholders.
For example, by improving part reuse in
design, manufacturing inventory can be reduced and product
quality improved. In addition, fewer spares are required to
be stocked for service, and procurement is able to achieve
more favourable prices on these parts due to higher volume
discounts with fewer suppliers.
One of the major issues is that vendors
are not able to articulate this message to their potential
customers. Their use of acronyms doesn't help. Customer research
developed for last year's Cambashi Seminar showed that customers
often don't understand their suppliers. Customers want to
hear how benefits can be achieved in their business, in their
language.
Engineering design and associated data management
solutions deliver significant value to customers but vendors
must develop more competent business and customer centric
sales arguments. Money talks, and the more money you can make
for a customer, the more they'll listen.
Allan
Behrens
|